TOPIC: The Impact of Employee Engagement on Staffing and Employment
General format and sequence
Title Page
Abstract
Introduction (At least 1 page, Level 1 heading)
Findings (At least 6 pages, organized under Level 1 and Level 2 headings)
Each article review should be 2–3 paragraphs. The following should be provided in the student’s own original words:
a) the theoretical model and/or conceptual model used by the author(s) of the article.
b) a description of whether the article is a quantitative study or qualitative article.
c) the research methodology used, and a description of the sample size and demographics if the study is quantitative.
d) the research findings reported by the author(s) of the article.
e) the conclusions of the author(s) of the article.
f) multiple in-text citations of the article using the author-date citation method required by the APA format.
Conclusions and Recommendations (At least 1 page, Level 1 heading)
References
Each of the 12 references must be discussed in the narrative, and correctly cited in the narrative.
Paraphrase – Do not quote
The assignment must not be a series of quotations. It is the student’s skills in critical analysis and
scholarly discussion that are being evaluated in this assignment; therefore, quotations should be
kept to an absolute minimum. Zero quotations are preferred. The ideas, concepts, and findings
located in the 12 scholarly articles should be paraphrased in the student’s own words, correctly
cited.
Headings
The content must be organized under headings in accordance with the APA format. As a general
rule, Level 1 and Level 2 headings will be used in this assignment.
Mechanics
All pages of all assignments, including the title page and reference list, must be double-spaced and typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts with one-inch margins on all four sides. MS Word files only. The Literature Review must meet the standards of the current edition of the APA manual for in-text citations, references, headings, grammar, spelling and mechanics.
You may submit your Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment to the draft
submission link entitled Literature Review: Part 3 – Draft Submission Assignment to check
your Turnitin results prior to submitting your final copy of the Literature Review: Part 3 –Final Submission Assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. The tool
is a starting point for instructors to check overall Academic Integrity and higher scores generally
indicate a higher probability of Academic Misconduct. The higher a score, the higher the
probability that there are too many quotations included in the narrative, and/or there are passages that have not been properly cited.
Resources
There are several resources provided by the Academic Success Center and Online Writing
Center websites for you to consult. Direct links to these sites are provided on the Literature
Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment page under the Literature Review Resources.
Criteria Ratings Points
Abstract 5 to >4 pts
Advanced
A scholarly abstract summarizing the key points of the literature review is present.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
A proficient abstract summarizing the key points of the literature review is present
3 to >0 pts
Developing
An abstract was present but was limited or incomplete.
0 pts
Not Present
An abstract was not present.
5 pts
Introduction 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
A scholarly, complete introduction of the topic of the literature review is present, including the central theme and/or organizational pattern. The Introduction begins with a Level 1 heading. This section is at least 1 page of original discussion.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
An introduction of the topic of the literature review is present, including the central theme and/or organizational pattern. The Introduction begins with a Level 1 heading. This section is at least 0.75 pages of original discussion.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
An introduction of the topic of the literature review was limited or incomplete; a Level 1 heading was not used; or this section was less than 0.75 pages of original discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
An Introduction was not present.
10 pts
Literature Review Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Findings 75 to >68 pts
Advanced
A comprehensive, scholarly review and discussion of each of the 12 articles on the reference list is present, organized thematically (or by topic) under APA-formatted headings. Each article is correctly cited in the narrative at least once, is from a peer-reviewed journal, and current scholarship is used (articles are not more than 5 years old). This section consists of at least 6 complete pages of original discussion.
68 to >62 pts
Proficient
A scholarly review and discussion of each of the 12 articles on the reference list is present, organized thematically (or by topic) under APA-formatted headings. Each article is correctly cited in the narrative at least once, is from a peer-reviewed journal, and current scholarship is used most of the time (1-2 articles were more than 5 years old). This section consists of 5.5-6 pages of original discussion.
62 to >0 pts
Developing
The discussion of sources on the reference list was limited or incomplete; the findings were not organized thematically (or by topic) or under APA-formatted headings; one or more sources were not cited in the narrative; one or more sources were not from a peer-reviewed journal; current scholarship was not used most of the time (more than 3 articles were more than 5 years old). This section was less than 5.5 pages of original discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
Findings were not present.
75 pts
Literature Review Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Conclusions and Recommendations
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
A scholarly, complete discussion of conclusions is present, including what the student has drawn from reviewing the literature; and a comprehensive, scholarly discussion of recommendations is present, including where discussions might proceed. An APA-formatted heading is present. This section is at least 1 page of original discussion.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
A discussion of conclusions is present, including what the student has drawn from reviewing the literature; and a comprehensive, scholarly discussion of recommendations is present, including where discussions might proceed. An APA-formatted heading is present. This section is at least 0.75 pages of original discussion.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
A conclusion was present but was limited or incomplete; Recommendations were present but were limited or incomplete; or a discussion of conclusions or a discussion of recommendations was missing; a heading was not present; or this section was less than 0.75 pages of original discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
Conclusions and Recommendations were not present.
15 pts
APA Formatting 25 to >22 pts
Advanced
An APA-formatted in-text citation was provided for each reference at the appropriate places in the narrative. An APA-formatted reference list was provided. APA-formatted headings were used (Level 1, and Level 2 if necessary). No more than 2 APA errors were present.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
An in-text citation was provided for each reference at the appropriate places in the narrative. A reference list was provided. Level 1 headings were used (and Level 2, if necessary). 3 – 6 APA errors were present.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
In-text citations were missing or contained errors; references were missing or contained errors; headings were missing or contained errors. More than 6 APA errors were present.
0 pts
Not Present
The APA format was not used.
25 pts
Literature Review Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Spelling, Grammar and Mechanics
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
The Literature Review begins with a title/cover page and was typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts on all pages; all pages were double-spaced; 1-inch margins on all four sides were used. Correct spelling and grammar were present throughout. Correct punctuation and spacing were present throughout. The paper was typed in a formal style and written in the third person. No more than 2 errors were present.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
Some errors with the title/cover page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch margins were present. Some errors with spelling and/or grammar were present. Some errors with punctuation and spacing were present. Some errors with formal style and/or third person were present. 3–6 errors were present.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant errors with the title/cover page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch margins were present. Significant errors with spelling and/or grammar were present. Significant errors with punctuation and spacing were present. Significant errors with formal style and/or third person were present. More than 6 errors were present.
0 pts
Not Present
Errors with spelling, grammar, and/or mechanics were so pervasive that the readability and level of scholarship of the paper were substantially reduced.
20 pts
Total Points: 150
Literature Review Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
,
Literature Review Assignment Instructions
A Literature Review is a comprehensive examination of the scholarly literature that is directly related to a selected topic (Efron & Ravid, 2019). Academic studies, theories, concepts, models, and research findings related to the selected topic are critically reviewed, analyzed, critiqued, and synthesized in this scholarly document.
In addition to reviewing current knowledge on the subject by selecting articles published within the past five years, the student will (a) compare and contrast different theoretical models, conceptual frameworks, and findings; (b) determine where gaps in the current literature may exist, and (c) discuss conclusions drawn from the articles reviewed; and (d) make recommendations for future HR leaders and HR researchers in the area of staffing and employment.
The student will research and write an original Literature Review on an approved topic related to the course content of staffing and employment. The Literature Review must include at least 12 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years and available within the Liberty University library databases.
Instructions
The Literature Review Assignment must meet the standards of the current edition of the APA manual for in-text citations, references, headings, grammar, spelling and mechanics.
The assignment will be submitted in three parts:
1. Quiz: Literature Review: Part 1 – Topic Submission
2. Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Assignment
a. You will be able to check your Turnitin results on this part of the project by submitting your paper to the Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Draft Submission Assignment. You are highly encouraged to review your results and make any adjustments prior to submitting your Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Assignment
3. Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission
a. You will be able to check your Turnitin results on this part of the project by submitting your paper to the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Draft Submission Assignment. You are highly encouraged to review your results and make any adjustments prior to submitting your Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment
Note: Any work from previous courses may not be re-used for this assignment.
Quiz: Literature Review: Part 1 – Topic Submission
For this portion of the Literature Review, you will provide the proposed topic for your Literature Review. This topic must relate directly to the course content of staffing and employment. Furthermore, you will provide a short rationale of the proposed topic, an explanation of how the topic relates to staffing and employment, and provide an explanation on how you will develop the Literature Review.
Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Assignment
Using the approved topic, you will create an annotated bibliography that is at least 6–7 full and complete pages of original discussion and narrative–excluding the title page and reference list– that utilizes at least 8 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, published within the past 5 years. Once approved by the instructor, these 8 articles may be used again on the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment.
References may not come from websites, blogs, newspapers, books, textbooks, dictionaries, conference proceedings, magazines, dissertations or theses.
General format and sequence
Title page
Body of paper: This main section will consist of the annotations for all eight articles.
· Begin each annotation with a complete reference for the article, just as it will appear on the reference list.
· The annotation (short description) for each reference must include all of the following questions (2-3 complete paragraphs total per article):
· A summary of the article and how it fits in the topic chosen to research.
· A discussion of the depth of the article; sufficiently comprehensive? Too broad, or too narrow?
· An explanation of how this research will fit into the Literature Review.
· A brief description of the authors, their backgrounds, and their qualifications to publish in the field of study.
References
Note: Do not submit an abstract for this portion of the Literature Review.
Mechanics
All pages of all assignments, including the title page and reference list, must be double-spaced and typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts with one-inch margins on all four sides. MS Word files only. The Annotated Bibliography must meet the standards of the current edition of the APA manual for in-text citations, references, headings, grammar, spelling and mechanics.
You may submit your Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Assignment to the draft submission link entitled Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Draft Submission Assignment to check your Turnitin results prior to submitting your final copy of the Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography Assignment.
Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment
Length and references
The Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment must be at least 8–10 full and complete pages of original discussion and narrative, excluding the title page, abstract, and references, that utilizes at least 12 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, published within the past 5 years. References may not come from websites, blogs, newspapers, books, textbooks, dictionaries, conference proceedings, magazines, dissertations or theses. Strict conformance to current APA standards must be provided for in-text citations, references, headings, grammar, spelling and mechanics.
The student will use information from the Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography to develop and write the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission; however, the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission is a new, separate assignment with distinct requirements. The Literature Review: Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography must not be pasted into the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission.
General format and sequence
Title Page
Abstract
Introduction (At least 1 page, Level 1 heading)
Findings (At least 6 pages, organized under Level 1 and Level 2 headings)
Each article review should be 2–3 paragraphs. The following should be provided in the student’s own original words:
a) the theoretical model and/or conceptual model used by the author(s) of the article.
b) a description of whether the article is a quantitative study or qualitative article.
c) the research methodology used, and a description of the sample size and demographics if the study is quantitative.
d) the research findings reported by the author(s) of the article.
e) the conclusions of the author(s) of the article.
f) multiple in-text citations of the article using the author-date citation method required by the APA format.
Conclusions and Recommendations (At least 1 page, Level 1 heading)
References
Each of the 12 references must be discussed in the narrative, and correctly cited in the narrative.
Paraphrase – Do not quote
The paper must not be a series of quotations. It is the student’s skills in critical analysis and scholarly discussion that are being evaluated in this assignment; therefore, quotations should be kept to an absolute minimum. Zero quotations are preferred. The ideas, concepts, and findings located in the 12 scholarly articles should be paraphrased in the student’s own words, correctly cited.
Headings
The content must be organized under headings in accordance with the APA format. As a general rule, Level 1 and Level 2 headings will be used in this assignment.
Mechanics
All pages of all assignments, including the title page and reference list, must be double-spaced and typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts with one-inch margins on all four sides. MS Word files only. The Literature Review must meet the standards of the current edition of the APA manual for in-text citations, references, headings, grammar, spelling and mechanics.
You may submit your Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment to the draft submission link entitled Literature Review: Part 3 – Draft Submission Assignment to check your Turnitin results prior to submitting your final copy of the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. The tool is a starting point for instructors to check overall Academic Integrity and higher scores generally indicate a higher probability of Academic Misconduct. The higher a score, the higher the probability that there are too many quotations included in the narrative, and/or there are passages that have not been properly cited.
Resources
There are several resources provided by the Academic Success Center and Online Writing Center websites for you to consult. Direct links to these sites are provided on the Literature Review: Part 3 – Final Submission Assignment page under the Literature Review Resources.
· APA 7th Template (Graduate/Doctoral)
· APA 7th Sample Paper (Graduate)
· Literature Reviews: A Guide
References
Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Writing the Literature Review: A practical guide. [e-Book]. Guilford Press.
Page 1 of 4
,
Annotated Bibliography
Aboramadan, M., Albashiti, B., Alharazin, H., & Dahleez, K. A. (2019). Human resources management practices and organizational commitment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2019-0160
In this article, we look at how higher education institutions can improve their human resource management processes to foster greater employee dedication. Faculty members from Jordanian universities were surveyed for this research to determine their level of dedication to their respective institutions' respective organizations. The survey's findings suggest that HRM activities including hiring, evaluating performance, and training can boost employee dedication to the company. The authors draw the conclusion that human resource management techniques have a significant role in creating organizational commitment, and they recommend that universities pay more attention to these practices. This article is relevant to the larger discussion of employee engagement and its effects on the workplace because it demonstrates how HR procedures may aid in fostering commitment among faculty members, which in turn can lead to better staff retention and enhanced work performance. The article provides enough coverage, with a sufficient assessment of the literature and sufficient evidence from the survey. All of the authors have ties to the University of Jordan, making them qualified to write about academic topics. Adding evidence of the favorable benefits of HR management practices on employee engagement, this study will round out the existing literature.
Arslan, M., & Roudaki, J. (2019). Examining the role of employee engagement in the relationship between organizational cynicism and employee performance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 39(1/2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2018-0087
The relationship between corporate cynicism and employee performance is examined in this article regarding the importance of employee engagement. The study used a poll to gauge employee engagement and organizational cynicism among a sample of Turkish employees. According to the survey's findings, corporate cynicism has a bad impact on staff engagement, which in turn has a bad impact on worker productivity. The authors come to the conclusion that workplace cynicism can negatively impact employee engagement and productivity, and they advise employers to take action to lessen workplace skepticism. Because it demonstrates how organizational cynicism can result in lower levels of employee engagement, which can result in poorer levels of employee performance, this article is relevant to the discussion of employee engagement and its effects on staffing and employment. The article provides a thorough analysis of the literature as well as specific examples from the survey, making it adequately thorough. The writers have the credentials to publish in organizational behavior because they are both associated with the Department of Business Administration at the University of Tekirdag in Turkey. By demonstrating the detrimental consequences of corporate cynicism on employee engagement and performance, this study will fit into the literature review.
Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., Lako, C. J., & de Vries, M. S. (2019). The Attitudinal, Behavioral, and Performance Outcomes of Work Engagement: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Across the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19840399
Work involvement is investigated in this article, along with its effects on attitudes, behaviors, and productivity in the public, semipublic, and private sectors. In this study, a meta-analysis was utilized to examine the previous research on the subject. According to the findings, employee engagement has a favorable effect on several different outcomes, including contentment in one's employment, loyalty to one's employer, and productivity on the job. The authors arrive at the conclusion that employees' level of involvement at work is a significant predictor of their motivation and output, and they recommend that businesses take measures to increase employee engagement at work. Because it demonstrates how employee engagement at work can lead to enhanced performance, which in turn can lead to better staffing decisions and increased employee retention, this article is relevant to the topic of employee engagement and its effects on staffing and employment. The study is adequately detailed, offering both a complete literature review and extensive empirical evidence from a meta-analysis. All of the authors have degrees in organizational behavior and teach at the University of Twente in the Netherlands, so you know you're getting quality work. This study contributes to the literature review since it demonstrates the favorable impacts of work engagement on productivity.
Dubbelt, L., Demerouti, E., & Rispens, S. (2019). The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1576632
benefits of job crafting in terms of employee enthusiasm, productivity, and job happiness are discussed in this article. Examining how job crafting affects these three outcomes, the study employed both longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence. According to the study's findings, job crafting improves not one but three outcomes. The authors conclude that job crafting is a useful strategy for increasing employee enthusiasm for their jobs, productivity on the job, and overall job and career happiness, and they recommend that businesses adopt measures to promote job crafting. This article is relevant to the larger discussion of employee engagement and its effects on staffing and employment because it demonstrates how better performance can result from careful job crafting, which in turn can lead to more effective staffing decisions and higher rates of employee retention. The essay provides considerable coverage, including a substantial literature review and many examples from the research. Each of the authors holds a position at the prestigious Utrecht University in the Netherlands, making them uniquely qualified to contribute to the subject of organizational psychology through their writing. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by demonstrating the favorable benefits of job crafting on employee engagement and performance.
Kashyap, V., & Chaudhary, R. (2019). Linking Employer Brand Image and Work Engagement: Modelling Organizational Identification and Trust in Organization as Mediators. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 6(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093719844644
This article analyzes the impact that organizational identity and trust in organization play in bridging the gap between employer brand image and employee engagement in the workplace. Survey data was collected from a representative sample of Indian workers to determine their perceptions of their employer's brand, their sense of belonging to their company, their trust in management, and their enthusiasm for their jobs. The survey's findings show that employees are more invested in their jobs when they feel a favorable connection to the company they work for. The authors argue that an organization's employer brand image is significant in promoting employee engagement at work, and they recommend that businesses take measures to enhance their brand image. This article is relevant to the larger discussion about employee engagement and its effects on staffing and employment because it demonstrates how a strong employer brand image can increase employee engagement, which in turn increases the likelihood of retaining and motivating employees and the quality of their output. In terms of coverage, the article meets expectations, offering both a complete literature analysis and substantial evidence from the poll. To write about human resource management, the writers need only point to their affiliation with the Department of Business Administration at India's Jaypee Business School as evidence of their expertise in the topic. Findings from this study will contribute to the existing body of knowledge by demonstrating the relevance of employer brand image to employee engagement.
Teo, S. T. T., Bentley, T., & Nguyen, D. (2019). Psychosocial work environment, work engagement, and employee commitment: A moderated, mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102415
This article analyzes the role that organizational identity and trust in organization play as mediators between the employer brand image and employee engagement at work. Employees in India were surveyed to determine their perceptions of their employer's brand, their loyalty to their company, their faith in management, and their enthusiasm for their jobs. Employees who identify with their employer and have faith in its leadership are more invested in their work, as shown by the survey's findings. Organizations, the authors argue, should aim to enhance their brand image as an employer because it is a significant element in boosting employees' enthusiasm for their jobs. This article is relevant to the topic of employee engagement and its effects on staffing and employment because it demonstrates how a strong employer brand image may boost employee engagement, which in turn can increase staff retention and productivity. Article provides sufficient coverage, including both a complete literature analysis and copious survey data. Both authors have academic credentials in human resource management because they teach in the Department of Business Administration at India's Jaypee Business School. Integration into the literature review is ensured by the provision of evidence for the beneficial effects of employer brand image on employee engagement uncovered by the current study.
Turner, P. (2020). Employee En
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
1. Click on the “Place order tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order price.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
Need help with this assignment?
Order it here claim 25% discount
Discount Code: SAVE25