For this assignment, collaboratively discuss with your principal mentor and at least one other individual at the district or community level what strategies are utilized in ob

Clinical Field Experience E: Strategic Leadership and Management Functions in

Practice – Rubric

Community Strategies 9 points

Criteria Description

Community Strategies

5. Target 9 points

Reflection includes insightful strategies to maintain a presence in the community or

understand its strengths and needs. Strategies to develop productive relationships

and engage community resources for the school are innovative.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Reflection includes strategies to maintain a presence in the community or

understand its strengths and needs. Strategies to develop productive relationships

and engage community resources for the school are clear and effective.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Reflection vaguely addresses strategies to maintain a presence in the community or

understand its strengths and needs. Strategies to develop productive relationships

and engage community resources for the school are underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Reflection does not address strategies to maintain a presence in the community or

understand its strengths and needs. Strategies to develop productive relationships

and engage community resources for the school are poor or not included.

Ethical Responsibilities 9 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Responsibilities

5. Target 9 points

Reflection expertly addresses ethical responsibilities of school administrators in

stewarding school resources and being transparent with school resources. The use

of school resources is specifically aligned to the schools’ mission and vision.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Collapse All

Reflection realistically addresses ethical responsibilities of school administrators in

stewarding school resources and being transparent with school resources. The use

of school resources is clearly aligned to the schools’ mission and vision.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Reflection minimally addresses ethical responsibilities of school administrators in

stewarding school resources and being transparent with school resources. The use

of school resources is not clearly aligned to the schools’ mission and vision.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Reflection unrealistically addresses ethical responsibilities of school administrators

in stewarding school resources and being transparent with school resources. The

use of school resources is not aligned to the schools’ mission and vision.

PSEL Standards 2 and 8 and Implications for Future Practice 6 points

Criteria Description

PSEL Standards 2 and 8 and Implications for Future Practice

5. Target 6 points

Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.

Elements of PSEL Standards 2 and 8 are expertly incorporated into reflection.

4. Acceptable 5.22 points

Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.

Elements of PSEL Standards 2 and 8 are accurately incorporated into reflection.

3. Approaching 4.44 points

Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.

Elements of PSEL Standards 2 and 8 are weakly addressed.

2. Insufficient 4.14 points

Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future

practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standards 2 and 8 are inaccurately addressed.

1. No Submission 0 points

Organization 3 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 3 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the

required word count.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is

within a reasonable range of the required word count.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with

a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the

required word count.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the

summary is widely outside of the required word count.

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use

5. Target 3 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder

comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some

practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent

language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Total 30 points